Vondy&LosA

[ratna332]

Of the program. Directed by the award-winning captain lezama , it will perform next saturday the 12th in the plaza mayor of segovia together with the germans 'heeresmusikkorps 12 veitshôhheim'. It is the most anticipated recital of the entire meeting program. See the promotional poster for the contest below:both torreblanca and areilza 's analysis and moratinos ' reaction and response have been the subject of many comments in the ministry of foreign affairs . According to diplomatic sources consulted by el confidencial digital , the article by torreblanca and areilza in the summer issue of the magazine 'foreign policy in spanish' caused enormous anger in a minister already angry with the press for its treatment of his trips. To equatorial guinea and gibraltar and its policy towards cuba, among other issues. Some of moratinos' anger can be inferred in the article, published in the september issue of the magazine 'político exterior' and signed by the minister himself, which serves as a reply to the work of torreblanca and areilza, and in which he accuses them of " lack of rigor and experience .

Curiously, torreblanca and areilza, men with recognized resumes and extensive experience as professors and experts in international politics, are not considered partisan people in their analyzes and, furthermore, they are intellectuals with divergent political Special Database ideas , coinciding only at the time. To evaluate the shortcomings of spanish foreign policy. Some foreign affairs sources do not hesitate to point out that both experts have felt retaliated and defenseless in the face of the minister's anger . They argue that their article offered an analytical description in the form of constructive criticism and without the intention to do harm , as befits a specialized magazine. Torreblanca and areilza present their “differential diagnosis” of spanish foreign policy in the form of a letter/report to president rodríguez zapatero . “why do you want to be remembered, in spain and outside of spain? Is there anything you are especially proud of?” the authors begin. Next , both professors compare the different international trajectories of gonzález and aznar, pointing out that zapatero's “achievements in foreign policy” “are somewhat more diffuse” and that the fact that he is a convinced europeanist does not mean that he should stop asking “what footprint will leave in the european union .




At the same time, torreblanca and areilza point out that “internal politics weighed heavily on his agenda and foreign action was not a priority,” at least during his first term, and they remind him that “bringing future solutions to the last town in his native león requires spend a lot of time outside of spain.” pointing out that zapatero has a “more left-wing” foreign policy than gonzález , they recall that both gonzález and aznar “were quite successful.” zapatero, on the other hand, “has not been able to complete (his objectives) satisfactorily,” so they suggest “that he review them and, eventually, change and reorient them.” sectorally , areilza and torreblanca make these observations regarding spanish diplomatic action: -- looking ahead to the spanish presidency of the eu in 2010 , "The personal imprint" of zapatero is missed, as well as "An orderly and clear overall vision." -- politicization of the foreign service : "Without depoliticization of the majority of the appointments of ambassadors and senior officials, it will not be possible for the ministry to work with a sense of state and give continuity to spanish foreign policy.
_________________
Special Database

[Reklama]